The Most Dangerous Intersections


It’s easy to understand why many right wing reactionaries express tepid support for Arab and African immigration to Europe and the United States, or at the very least wish to adopt some European equivalent of Islamic values into society. Many traditional conservatives get a semi-boner for Islam, because they think that what western civilization has become is itself so alien to them that it’s no longer worth saving. Better to usher in the barbarian hordes or channel their mentality to stamp out feminism, homosexuality and weak men. In my experience, asking a few probing questions to some of these individuals reveals that many of these chauvinistic manospherian reactionaries are themselves crypto –kebabs trying to weasel their Islamic values into European identitarian movements. Many others are genuine though.

Conversely, from an AltLeft, pro-White perspective, the feminists’ share of “intersectional feminism” shouldn’t be seen as the enemy in own right. Rather the target should specifically be the “intersectional” component, which needs to be strongly willed away like the opportunistic disembodied inhabitants of Planet of the Vampires. Far from enhancing feminism and the noble cause of women’s rights, intersectionality necessarily detracts from it.  What other conclusion could one possibly come to?

According to Wikipedia:

Intersectionality holds that the classical conceptualizations of oppression within society, such as racism, sexism, classism, ableism, biphobia, homophobia, transphobia and belief-based bigotry, do not act independently of one another. Instead, these forms of oppression interrelate, creating a system of oppression that reflects the “intersection” of multiple forms of discrimination.

The problem with intersectionality is that the various forms of “oppression”outlined above, don’t interrelate in the ways that are claimed. Some of these things are not like the others! To be sincerely invested in advocating for feminism and women’s rights actually requires one to become more racist. Intersectionality has in fact harmed the cause of women’s rights by refusing to acknowledge the disproportionate rate at which non-whites and third world immigrants rape and commit violent or disrespectful acts toward western women. When intersectional feminists do point out this behavior, almost always the racial component is ignored, and it is attributed to just “men,” “youths,” “teens” etc.  A good example of this was the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal in Britain, in which 1,400 underage girls had been abused by gangs of Pakistani men. You would think feminists would have been vocal in speaking out about this horrific abuse, but due to “intersectionality” and anti-racism, it was brushed under the rug. People like Nick Griffin, who did try to draw attention to these types of problems back in 2004(nearly 10 years before anyone bothered to do anything) were charged with suspicion to incitement of racial hatred(ie. crimethink.) When a far right shitlord is the only one defending teenage western women from hordes of barbarous rapists, then it might be time to recognize that intersectional feminism is a bust. Many secular women who have escaped from Arab or Islamic countries know this, which is why even if they are far left, they stick with the tried and true variety of feminism(ie advocating for women… without any alchemic PC admixture.)

There are countless other relatable phenomenon and broadly observable patterns. In Scandinavian countries,  non-whites commit rape and other violent felonies at vastly higher rates than native European caucasians. Feminists should be clamoring to restrict 3rd world immigration to minimize the hostile elements in their societies, but they don’t. They advocate for less restrictions on immigration! Why? because intersectionality and its maze of grievances apparently prioritizes anti-racism, political correctness and anti-whitism. Advocacy for actual women’s safety is relegated to the back of the bus, to be wasted on trivial frivolities like “transmisogyny” and “Bechdel Tests.” 

It doesn’t make sense for those who claim to primarily be concerned with empowering women to import large numbers(or any numbers) of people from Middle Eastern or African countries. Statistically speaking, when you bring non-whites into your society, you’re inviting a rape culture exponentially more threatening than whatever “Douche Ness” monsters are lurking at the average whitey fratbro house(and yeah I hate those guys, too.) Remember when that cat calling video went viral?  The one of a Jewish girl walking in New York City for 10 hours and being hollered at and bothered by random men on the street. It backfired of course, because people observed that most of the obnoxious men doing the cat calling were non-white. This was something you weren’t supposed to notice, because you’re never supposed to notice race unless it is a white male committing oppression in his natural habitat. Yet deep down everyone knows that non-whites(with the exception of East Asians) are typically much more obnoxiously aggressive in hitting on women, and they are more abusive once in relationships as well.

When push comes to shove, intersectionalists are more invested in promoting white guilt than advocating for women’s rights. If man is the most dangerous game, then intersectional feminists’ insistence on demonstrating solidarity with the most violently  misogynist demographics, can only result in talented and capable western women being reduced to navigating the most dangerous intersectionsjust when they’ve finally gotten themselves on the road to success. I don’t write this as some kind of “concern troll.” Unlike traditionalists and manosphere chauvinists, I genuinely like and admire intelligent, confident, creative, sexually liberated, independent and sassy western women. I would love to see that sass weaponized in the battle against western civilization’s mutual enemies, not directed as friendly fire toward allies you didn’t even realize you had.

Remembering to Return Our Videotapes


My earliest familiarity with the work of Bret Easton Ellis was sometime in 1999. I was getting a lap dance from a stripper “named” Juliet at The Body Shop in West Hollywood(we aren’t exactly SWERFs here on the AltLeft.) The stripper told me I reminded her of the main character from American Psycho…not the handsome and future Dark Knight actor, Christian Bale mind you but the actual character from the story.  I don’t recall what creepy shit I must have been muttering in her ear, but I was an edgy, young, narcissistic loner exploring Los Angeles at the time. Her sensing that there was something darker lurking beneath my third rate hipster aesthetic was probably correct.

Don’t ever assume sex workers are stupid by the way.  Many of them make poor life choices and are not traditionally well educated, but they are cunning and know how to survive. Their existence up close and personal with the seedier elements of society exposes them to certain truths which Ivy League graduates are naively oblivious to. If you don’t believe me, just start searching through escort ads on Backpage and notice how many hundreds of them explicitly say “No Black Men.” People often talk about how communism is often romanticized among bougie western hipsters who never had to live under it, while those who lived in communist countries suffered and were often trying to escape. The same can be said of diversity, which people idealize from the safety of their gated communities in Vermont and gentrified Portland neighborhoods, while working class whites don’t have the luxury of entertaining bullshit fantasies about what living in a multicultural society is actually like.

One time in Las Vegas I asked a cab driver what he thought about the idea of someone moving to Vegas. In a thick accent, the origins of which I could not place(possibly Russian,) he told me “It is very cutthroat. If you are an honest guy forget it. You will never make it here. If you are a hooker, pimp, thief, you will do all right.”

Where was I going with this anyway? Ah yes, I brought up Bret Easton Ellis, because he has been making some politically incorrect waves of the AltLeft variety recently.  A lot of people have long suspected Ellis of being a closeted reactionary. Though someone as sexually depraved and anti-corporate culture would probably never be at ease on the right. I suspect that more than anything Ellis is just a another fellow Gen Xer who doesn’t buy into the PC bullshit and recognizes the perverse way in which it is stifling creativity and free thought. It’s the tracks where Tumblr Intersectionalists and billionaire corporate CEOs race together . “All aboard the pathological altruism and opportunistic corporatism express!” Bret Easton Ellis has made clear he is not hopping on that train. Neither should anyone else who values the ability to see things clearly and articulate their observations about the world in any honest and meaningful way. The pressure to conform to the social justice industrial complex is driving young hipster cubicle jockeys of the nouveau corporate world to a sort of “double life” crisis… the private madness of living a lie while knowing the truth.

“Yeah, sorry. I would attend that #BlackLivesMatter rally and candlelight vigil for Tyrone with you after work, but I just remembered I have to return some videotapes…”